01 / The essentials
The answer first
The evidence underneath
An executive summary slide states your recommendation, the reasons it holds and the decision you need from the audience
Give a senior reader enough to understand the conclusion without opening the rest of the deck, then use the following pages to support the detail
Recommend
State the action and the outcome you expect
Support
Choose two or three independent reasons that make the case
Ask
Name the decision, accountable owner and next date
02 / The example
A supplier decision
Ready for the room
Imagine a team comparing its supplier base: the slide needs to explain the opportunity and secure permission to negotiate, with the savings clearly presented as a target
| Part of the slide | What it says |
|---|---|
| Recommendation | Consolidate from 18 suppliers to 6 to target $4m in annual savings |
| Coverage | The six preferred suppliers already cover 92% of demand |
| Economics | Modelled savings depend on negotiated rates and adoption of preferred contracts |
| Risk | Qualify backup supply before moving critical categories |
| Decision | Approve a 90-day negotiation plan, owned by the procurement director |
Next gate: confirm commercial terms and coverage before a final consolidation decision
The page makes one request, shows why it is worth pursuing and keeps the condition visible — the audience can approve the next step without treating a forecast as a commitment
03 / Write the slide
Four steps to a sharper summary
- 1
Write the recommendation
Start with a verb and a concrete outcome: “Consolidate suppliers to target $4m in savings” gives the audience a position to evaluate
- 2
Choose the supporting reasons
Keep two or three distinct claims, each backed by a number, observation or comparison; move methodology and background to later pages
- 3
Make the ask specific
State what needs approval, who will act and when the decision returns, with the largest unresolved risk beside the request
- 4
Edit for a quick read
Read only the headline, supporting titles and ask; they should form a coherent argument even when the body copy is hidden





